If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
10.06.2025 06:27
Child pornography
Fraud
Conspiracy
No freedom is absolute.
Revealing classified information
Insurrection
Hillary thinks we must censor or "we lose total control". Why does she demand total control?
And much, much more.
Revenge porn
Insider trading
Perjury
Trade secrets
Threats of violence
HIPAA violations
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
Terroristic threats
What is the nastiest thing you had your wife do and she loved it?
False advertising
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.